The Mizrahi Tefahot FileIndependent investigation
The bank’s fiduciary duty

Union Bank (Agud) to Mizrahi Tefahot: 615 Complaints and "Ad Hoc" Fixes

Union Bank of Israel (Bank Agud) customers were moved to Mizrahi Tefahot in 2021 and 2022. The banks’ own reports record faults handled "ad hoc", corporate customers transferred "in a non-automated manner", and hundreds of complaints a year. What they say, and what an affected customer can demand.

Published: November 8, 2026Reading time: 5 minutes
Read the article ↓

In 2022 the public enquiries unit of Mizrahi Tefahot Bank received 615 complaints classified under "Other (Agud merger)". That is 14.22% of all complaints the bank received that year. In 2023 another 540 complaints were logged under "Other (including Agud merger)", 11% of the total. These figures come from the public enquiries reports that the bank itself publishes on its website.

This article brings together what Union Bank of Israel (Bank Agud) and Mizrahi Tefahot wrote in their official reports about the transfer: how customers were converted, what went wrong in their own words, and what a customer whose account or loan did not transfer properly can ask for.

In short

How Agud customers were moved

On September 30, 2020 Mizrahi Tefahot completed an exchange tender offer for 100% of Bank Agud’s shares. Customer conversion began in the second quarter of 2021 and proceeded gradually. In its 2022 corporate responsibility report Mizrahi Tefahot described the conversion as "human and individual".

Customers who did not move voluntarily were converted unilaterally. Bank Agud’s June 2022 report says external consultants were hired "with the knowledge, methodology and tools to carry out the unilateral conversion, including a dedicated platform for data cleansing and conversion". The centralized conversion ran in the second half of November 2022, about a month before the statutory merger.

Bank Agud’s final report: faults "handled ad hoc"

Bank Agud’s final financial report, as of December 29, 2022, describes the IT risk in these words (translated from Hebrew):

"The unilateral conversion of the remaining customers was carried out successfully in a centralized manner; within this, faults that occurred were handled ad hoc. In addition, the remaining corporate customers were converted unilaterally in a non-automated manner."

The report does not say which faults occurred, how many customers were affected or how each fault was fixed. The same page lists tasks left for the first quarter of 2023, including "consolidating computer sites, completing the platform for retrieving historical information and transferring it". On merger day, the tool meant to retrieve Agud customers’ historical data was not finished.

The merger agreement made completion conditional, among other things, on written confirmation from the officer responsible for information technology at the absorbing bank that technological and operational solutions were in place "to enable the transfer of the target company’s customer files, including all information required by any law". That separate confirmation was not found in the Registrar of Companies file that was reviewed.

The numbers

The bank explained the gap itself: "the high rate of justified complaints at Mizrahi-Tefahot and Agud was also affected by the merger process, which raised the number of enquiries and the rate of justified ones."

An account or loan that did not transfer properly

The reports do not identify any customer or explain what happened to any particular record. A customer whose account, loan or standing orders did not appear after the transfer, or appeared with wrong data, does not have to accept a general answer. A loan that does not show in the system has not necessarily been cancelled, and a balance the bank shows is not necessarily correct. The documentation decides.

This also concerns Agud Leasing customers. According to Bank Agud’s final report, from November 1, 2022 Mizrahi Tefahot provided computing services to the subsidiary Agud Leasing, known today as Mizrahi Tefahot Leasing.

What to ask the bank for in writing

How to file a complaint

The first step is the bank’s public enquiries unit. According to Mizrahi Tefahot’s corporate responsibility report, every enquiry gets a full answer within 45 days, and in exceptional cases within 60 days. If the answer is not satisfactory, you can turn to the Public Enquiries Unit of the Banking Supervision Department at the Bank of Israel and attach the bank’s reply. Details in our guide to filing a complaint against Mizrahi Tefahot.

Questions and answers

When did Bank Agud merge into Mizrahi Tefahot?

Mizrahi Tefahot bought all of Bank Agud’s shares on September 30, 2020. Customers were moved gradually from 2021, the remaining customers were converted in November 2022, and the statutory merger was completed on December 29, 2022.

Were there problems in the transfer from Agud to Mizrahi Tefahot?

Yes, according to the banks’ own reports. Bank Agud’s final report says faults "were handled ad hoc", and Mizrahi Tefahot wrote that for some customers the transfer "was not completed optimally".

How many complaints were filed about the Agud merger?

615 complaints at Mizrahi Tefahot in 2022 under "Other (Agud merger)" and 540 in 2023 under "Other (including Agud merger)". Bank Agud itself received 468 complaints in 2022.

Sources

Based on the official reports of Bank Agud and Mizrahi Tefahot. Quotations are translated from the Hebrew originals. This is not legal advice.

Read next